There are few places the story I used to work, there part 2 of the head, the one every working day just angry - angry if there are men who make mistakes or less correct in doing a job call it "the head of A" and one other person he rarely angry and tend to direct his men if they feel less competent men doing a job dla call it "the head of B".
Once upon a time "the head of a" delegate his men to do a job, his men inadvertently made a mistake that might be tolerable if it is seen, but his boss (head of section A) rebuked his men out - run out and and men can only get out of the room was silent after his men out of the room I asked , "what is it?? you look listless??" men's responsibility: "yes I just finished the boss got angry,but I just made a mistake common". (grumbling tone). "oo ..." I replied.
After some time passed, some point "the head of a" do not come to work because there are interests that require him out of town to hear his boss did not come to work they cheered with delight. job at hand because even forgotten to feel free without governing this adaa it or something.
Different story with the "chief part B" of when the event is similar to the "head of A", his boss made a mistake trying to direct and give tips - tips for his mistakes are not made anymore. every time he tried to motivate his men to always be the best with patience.
Until one day "the head of B" is not in the office due to be out of town, and when I met the men asked: "where your father did not appear??". replied his men: "yes, he was again out of town on business a sudden". I asked: 'wow .... nice huh?? ". he replied again:" What good? This work a lot, not good at the boss when he came home when this job not finished ".
From the example above story we can draw the conclusion that there are differences in the type of lead among the "A" and the "B". The "A" underneath his men obeyed, but not for the self-awareness of his men but was afraid because there are watching, so grow the soul to work if there is watching.
So if you as a leader, a leader like whether you've been??
Once upon a time "the head of a" delegate his men to do a job, his men inadvertently made a mistake that might be tolerable if it is seen, but his boss (head of section A) rebuked his men out - run out and and men can only get out of the room was silent after his men out of the room I asked , "what is it?? you look listless??" men's responsibility: "yes I just finished the boss got angry,but I just made a mistake common". (grumbling tone). "oo ..." I replied.
After some time passed, some point "the head of a" do not come to work because there are interests that require him out of town to hear his boss did not come to work they cheered with delight. job at hand because even forgotten to feel free without governing this adaa it or something.
Different story with the "chief part B" of when the event is similar to the "head of A", his boss made a mistake trying to direct and give tips - tips for his mistakes are not made anymore. every time he tried to motivate his men to always be the best with patience.
Until one day "the head of B" is not in the office due to be out of town, and when I met the men asked: "where your father did not appear??". replied his men: "yes, he was again out of town on business a sudden". I asked: 'wow .... nice huh?? ". he replied again:" What good? This work a lot, not good at the boss when he came home when this job not finished ".
From the example above story we can draw the conclusion that there are differences in the type of lead among the "A" and the "B". The "A" underneath his men obeyed, but not for the self-awareness of his men but was afraid because there are watching, so grow the soul to work if there is watching.
So if you as a leader, a leader like whether you've been??
